Sociological Benefits And Economic Ramifications Of The Avoidance Of Junk Foods

Lesson 38 - Sociological Benefits And Economic Ramifications Of The Avoidance Of Junk Foods

38.1. Introduction

38.2. The Economics Of Junk Food 38.3. Junk Food Tactics

38.4. Breaking The Junk Food Addiction 38.5. Questions & Answers

Article #1: Control Through Clear Thinking by A.D. Andrews, Jr. Article #2: Is This The Kind Of System You’d Like To Live Under? Article #3: Blueprint For Survival by Keki R. Sidhwa, N.D., D.O. Article #4: Junk Fooders Have It Made

Introduction

38.1.1 The Junk Food Problem

38.1.2 The 50% Junk Food Diet

38.1.3 Junk Food Consumption of the Average American (Per Year)

38.1.1 The Junk Food Problem

Junk foods are more than just something to eat. They also represent money, profits, past emotional associations, childhood indulgences, and high-power advertising.

The junk food problem is not simply one of nutrition, but is related to the economic structure of this country and to the psychological and emotional makeup of millions of Americans.

If you want to wean yourself, your friends, and your clients away from health-de- stroying junk foods, then you must also understand the true nature of junk food addic- tion. You must learn how junk food is promoted, and why we allow ourselves to become willing addicts to food that supplies no nutrition or fulfills no need in the human diet. In short, you must learn about the economical and psychological aspects of junk food.

38.1.2 The 50% Junk Food Diet

More than half of all foods eaten by the typical American are junk foods. A junk food in this case means a food that is exceptionally high in sugar, fat or salt and supplies little or no nutrition. In short, a junk food consists largely of calories and little else.

Still, it is hard to believe that one out of every two bites eaten is a mouthful of junk food. Yet, it is true. Here’s what the typical American ate last year:

38.1.3 Junk Food Consumption of the Average American (Per Year)

1. Refined white sugar 100 pounds

2. Fats and Oils 55 pounds

3. Soda and Cola Drinks 300 cans or bottles

4. Chewing gum 200 sticks

5. Ice Cream 80 quarts

6. Candy 18 pounds

7. Potato Chips 5 pounds

8. Other snack chips 2 pounds

9. Doughnuts 63 dozen

10. Cookies and cakes 70 pounds

On the average, every man, woman and child in this country is eating about 700 pounds of junk food each year. This does not even count other substandard and inappro- priate foods, such as meat, alcohol, white bread, jams, jellies, and soon.

These foods have no nutritional value; indeed, they contribute to over 90% of all ill- nesses in this country. Why do people eat them? Obviously it’s not for any food value.

No, junk foods are eaten for two basic reasons: 1) they are highly visible, heavily advertised and are a cornerstone of this nation’s food dollar; and 2) junk foods exert a subtle but powerful psychological appeal for the user of such foods.

38.2. The Economics Of Junk Food

38.2.1 Foods For Profit

38.2.2 Creating a Need

38.2.3 Partners In Crime

38.2.4 Surviving The Supermarket Jungle

38.2.1 Foods For Profit

Junk foods exist today for only one reason: they are highly profitable. Because they can be marked up so heavily over the costs of production, junk foods put millions of dollars into the pockets of manufacturers.

It’s a fact that the lowest-profit item in most grocery stores is the produce—the fresh fruits and vegetables—and that the highest mark-up comes from packaged, processed and junk foods.

Natural and traditional foods, like fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds, are rarely adver- tised because they cannot be given a brand name or identity by a manufacturer. After all, a potato is just a potato, and worth only a few cents a pound. But if you slice that potato, boil it in oil, add a large dose of salt and preservatives, and package it a bright bag with a catchy name, then you have potato chips that can be sold for ten to twenty times the cost of the original potato.

Even twenty years ago, it was discovered that for every dollar spent on breakfast cereals (a sugary junk food), only a fraction went for the cost of the raw materials. Con- sider where the average junk food dollar goes:

For Each Dollar Spent On Junk Food...

• 12 cents goes for packaging
• 17 cents pays for the advertising and promotion
• 55 cents goes for processing and profit-markup
• 6 cents is for additives, preservatives and colorings
• 10 cents is for the actual food in the product In contrast, for every dollar spent on produce and natural foods (like whole grains, nuts, seeds, dried fruits), about 65 cents goes for the actual food cost and the remaining for transportation and retail markup. Not only does the consumer of junk and processed foods pay in terms of health and well-being, he is also spending 5 to 20 times as much as he should for the actual food. Here’s another example: a popular “food” developed a few years ago was called “Shake ‘n Bake.” It was a food crust or covering put on chicken, fish and so on. It sold for $2.63 per pound. It was mostly wheat flour, with a few artificial spices and coloring, that could be purchased for 15 cents a pound for its raw ingredients. The consumer was paying the extra $2.48 for television advertising and promotion. It’s the advertising and packaging that make junk foods so expensive and so prof- itable. In fact, without mass advertising, there would probably be no junk foods. An un-

derstanding of the junk food problem, then, requires an understanding of the advertising and promotion of this food.

38.2.2 Creating a Need

Of all the products sold in this country, food is the most ideally suited to manipu- lation and deception. The consumer has a limited ability to evaluate the effects of food processing on its nutritional value. He has no idea about the long-term effects of food additives on his health. He cannot verify any of the claims made by the advertising.

Food should serve one primary purpose: supplying the materials needed by the body for its health and preservation. Junk foods cannot do this. In fact, they do just the oppo- site. In that case, it should be easily seen that there are no rational reasons to purchase or consume junk foods. There is no real need for them.

The manufacturers of these foods realize this. They also know that if they can create an imagined need for their products, they can get consumers to buy them. If you take a child that is raised away from the influences of television, peer influence, and decep- tive advertising and ask him what he desires when he is hungry, he might respond with something like “an apple” or “a banana.” He most assuredly wouldn’t answer with “a Ding-Dong” or “Captain Chocolate Cereal.”

Unless a junk food is advertised, we know nothing about it. Having no innate need for it, we wouldn’t buy it. But if we are told that it exists and that we should probably try it, then we may fall prey to the advertising gimmicks of junk food salesmen.

Michael S. Lasky, author of The Complete Junk Food Book, has this to say about eating junk food and the power of advertising:

“We are all proselytized at an important age into consuming puppets of the junk food barons. Our parents inadvertently help them by buying their products as a form of ‘re- ward’ food. We grow up unaware that we have slowly acquired a junk food habit by the subtle forces of advertising. By the time we are capable of making a decision about junk food, we are already hooked from years and years of indulging in what we had been told by TV was good food.”

Actually, very little “good food” is advertised. Eighty percent of all food advertising is for blatant junk foods. Most of the remaining 20% is for convenience foods that are often little better than the candy, cakes, and snack foods which make up the majority of food advertising. In fact, out of the top 100 most heavily advertised food products, over 30 of them have absolutely zero food value, except for empty calories.

The majority of Americans receive almost all of their nutritional information from advertising. In other words, the typical person only knows as much about nutrition and good food as the advertisers want to tell him. When asked how good a job food man- ufacturers do in telling the public about good nutrition, a leading advertising executive for a convenience food company said: “The job of product advertising is to persuade and sell, not to educate.”

Studies have shown that it does not matter how nutritious a food may be or even how good it tastes. It is advertising alone that sells a food product, and it is primarily the junk foods and the nonfoods that are advertised the heaviest.

38.2.3 Partners In Crime

The manufacturers and advertisers of junk food are not the only ones to blame for our nation’s ill health. Economics dicates that chain supermarkets and grocery stores must also be aggressive partners with the producers of junk food.

Walk into any grocery store and what do you see? Outside of maybe one aisle for fresh produce and the milk and meat sections, the rest of the store is filled with packaged and convenience junk foods.

Consider these facts: Eighty percent of all food items sold in the supermarket did not exist ten years ago. In the past decade, over 9700 new items were introduced into gro- cery stores. The majority of these items are packaged junk foods which are characterized by a remarkable lack of nutrients due to overprocessing.

That’s right, your friendly neighborhood grocer is simply another of the links in the junk food chain—foods that the Senate Committee on Human Health and Nutrition say contribute to 6 out of 10 of the leading causes of death in this country.

38.2.4 Surviving The Supermarket Jungle

More than 50% of all purchases made in a supermarket are done on a whim. You don’t go to a grocery store with the conscious thought of buying frozen brownies or but- terscotch chip cookies. The designers of supermarkets know this, and consequently they stack all of the high-profit junk foods in front of the consumer so it is impossible to avoid seeing them.

In a book called The Supermarket Trap, author Jennifer Cross says that even a person with a cast-iron will can fall prey to the junk food merchandising used in grocery stores. “The consumer’s senses become so blitzed by the sheer amount of food choices that everything becomes a blur. Logic and common sense fail us, and we choose food items solely because of attractive packaging or name recognition.”

The simple way to avoid such a trap is to buy only specific items from a supermarket. If you go into the store and head straight for the fresh produce department and come straight out, you can miss the cookies, candies and packaged foods that might beckon you. Most grocery shoppers make the mistake of pushing their basket up one aisle and down the other, exposing themselves to thousands of poor food choices and useless products.

Marketing studies have shown that from 70 to 90% of the time, the purchase of junkie favorites like candy, frozen desserts, snacks and chips occur because of an in- stored decision. People do not consciously go into a store to purchase useless and de- structive nonfood items, but once they are inside, they become fair game for the promo- tion and advertising tricks of the store.

There are two ways to handle this situation. The best way is simply to refuse to ever buy or eat such products. If junk foods are never a part of your diet, you’ll never be tempted to buy them. Even if you eat them only on rare occasions, the potential for buy- ing them will still remain. The second way is to make a list before you go shopping. Then refuse to buy anything not on your list, and always shop alone—without a spouse or begging children.

38.3. Junk Food Tactics

38.3.1 Candy Is Good For You And Other Lies

38.3.2 The Great Fortification Rip-off 38.3.3 Hooking the Kids

38.3.1 Candy Is Good For You And Other Lies

Not only does the junk food industry aggressively promote health-destroying foods through advertising, but they defend them with a barrage of propaganda, misinforma- tion, and outright lies. Much of this propaganda is aimed at children and concerned par- ents.

Consider the following statements that are in a booklet distributed to over 60,000 students by the National Confectioner’s Association.

1. “Candy is vital for weight watchers. To reduce, eat candy before and after each meal. We can promise you it works.”

1. “Candy helps fight fever and can prevent vomiting and diarrhea.”
2. “Candy is not the cause of cavities, but the lack of hard chewing causes tooth decay.” Not to be outdone, the National Soft Drink association passes out literature to chil- dren and high school athletes that tell them “soda drinks are a good source of water.” A better source of water is water itself—but then, you can’t sell pure water for a hefty profit under some brand name. Finally, read what the Hershey Foods Corporation has to say about proper nutrition in their “Nutritional Information” handbook: “Calories are important, and foods which supply only calories can, if used correctly, contribute to good nutrition.” Of course, one of the highest calorie, no-nutrition foods is white sugar—a chief ingredient in this man- ufacturer’s products. 38.3.2 The Great Fortification Rip-off Besides deceptive advertising and outrageous propaganda, the junk food industry de- fends its products by emphasizing the added nutrients these products contain. “Fortified” candy bars and cereals are used to lure consumers into thinking that they might be get- ting a little nutrition among the garbage. Here’s how it works. Junk food manufacturers know that their products have no nu- tritional value and that their foods are open to attack by nutritionists. To head off such criticism, they often add vitamins and minerals to their products. Thus we have sugary bits of cereal that claim to supply 100% of all our vitamin and mineral needs. There are candy bars that give us “10% of all 19 nutrients” that we need. Adding inorganic and useless vitamins and minerals to junk food is a cheap process. You can turn a box of sugared, processed cereal into a daily vitamin pill by adding about two cents worth of additives. In turn, these fortified junk foods are then marked up 15 to 25 times what it costs to add these useless vitamins and minerals. Fortified junk foods still have the white sugar, the saturated fats, the high salt con- tent, and the empty-calories. The consumer is fooled by two cents of added minerals and vitamins. Even worse, the so-called “extra” vitamins and minerals which were added to the junk food cannot be used anyway. They are inorganic chemicals, just like the other additives and the preservatives already laced through the destructive foods. 38.3.3 Hooking the Kids Children are the helpless members of out society. And they are the biggest target for the junk food pushers. Children know nothing about nutrition or the necessity of eating wholesome foods. They receive most of their knowledge from television programming and advertising. Junk foods are advertised on children’s television shows at the rate of 20 times per hour—certainly enough to qualify it as brainwashing. Robert B. Choate, a television crit- ic, told a Senate investigating committee, “When you take a child who sits in front of Saturday TV and hears sugar, sugar, sugar, chocolate, chocolate, chocolate, he picks up a habit that is going to last all his life.” “Get’em while they’re young” is the attitude of the sugar cereal and candy manufac- turers. And they’re successful. The Surgeon General’s Scientific Advisory Committee found that junk food products advertised on television are more frequently requested by children than any other products, including toys. “Television advertising,” says Dr. Judith J. Wurtman and author on children’s nutri- tion, “is probably the most persistent force undermining good- eating habits.” One father who became concerned about his children’s health threw away his television set after he became tired of salesmen in my living room telling lies to my children.” Maybe you don’t want to go that far, but here are some things you can do to counter the effects of junk food advertising on children.

1. Fightpropagandawithfacts.Nomatterhowyoungyourchildis,heorshecanunder- stand some basic facts like “Sugar will make your teeth rot and hurt” and “Fresh fruit makes you strong and healthy.”

2. Restricttelevisionwatching.Haveyourchildrenwatchcommercial-freeprogramsand stations. Try to avoid the heavy Saturday morning advertising schedule.

3. Giveyourownreactionstocommercials.Reactwithundisguiseddisgustatcommer- cials for bad food or products. Point out to children how advertising is often deceptive. Don’t let them think that television and advertising is to be trusted or accepted on face value. Teach them to think for themselves and to question things that they see or read.

If you’re a parent, you will have a massive job in reeducating and protecting your children from the effects of junk food advertising. It is amazing that we have removed ads for cigarettes and hard liquor from television, but allow ads for “Sugar Puffs-Puffs” and “Chocolate Doo-Dads” to be blast into our children’s brains at the rate of 5,000 per year.

Junk food addiction begins in childhood, and this is where the problem can be most easily handled.

38.4. Breaking The Junk Food Addiction

38.4.1 The Psychological Appeal of Junk Food

38.4.2 The Economic Benefits of Avoiding Junk Food 38.4.4 Kicking The Habit

38.4.1 The Psychological Appeal of Junk Food

We cannot blame the entire junk food problem on the manufacturers and advertisers of these products. After all, if people did not eat such foods, they would never be kept in the marketplace. But people do eat junk foods. And they eat them almost compulsively, without regard to their health or to the innate harmfulness of these foods.

Why do junk foods exercise such a stranglehold on America’s nutritional well-be- ing? Primarily because such foods are psychologically addictive. A habitual use of junk food occurs not because the food is fulfilling any physiological need, but because they answer some psychological need. People eat non-nutritious, worthless foods purely for emotional and psychological reasons.

Psychological studies have shown that food is the single most powerful emotional stimulus in our lives. We use foods as much to cheer us up, to fight depression, to reward ourselves, to indulge ourselves as we do to satisfy any hunger, real or imagined. And be- cause we often eat for emotional reasons, we often choose foods that are associated with specific emotional experiences. Unfortunately, such foods are often “pleasure” foods or junk foods.

“Most people do not eat foods because they are good for them,” says Dr. Robert S. Harris, a professor of nutritional biochemistry at MIT, “But because the foods appeal to their appetite, to their emotions, to their soul.”

Junk foods have a strong appeal to the primitive and infantile emotions. They are usually very sweet, very rich, and very filling. They remind us of our first rich and sweet food, mother’s milk. They take the place of the natural sweets, like fruits, that our sweet tooth craves.

Junk foods are often the foods that our parents gave us for being “good”—ice cream, candy, cookies. Consequently, when we have been “good,” we still reward ourselves with these foods. It is an early conditioning that persists long into adulthood.

It is interesting to observe that junk food is the single largest class of pollutants that modern man inflicts upon himself. Forget about air pollution, cigarette smoke, contami- nated water, radiation, or so on. It is the junk food eaten everyday by almost every per-

son in this country that is the biggest source of internal pollutions. Now psychologically, this is an interesting situation.

Junk foods, besides being a way to reward ourselves, now also become a way to punish ourselves. People who are depressed and who have a low self-esteem often eat health-destroying foods in an effort to punish themselves for being unworthy or for hav- ing committed imagined wrongs. Junk food becomes for these people a socially-sanc- tioned form of suicide.

A successful avoidance and elimination of junk food from the diet requires efforts from two sides. First, a barrage of nutritional information and hard facts about the de- structiveness of these foods must be obtained. Second, the person’s psychological state must be evaluated and improved so that this addiction can be exposed and eliminated forever.

38.4.2 The Economic Benefits of Avoiding Junk Food

Nutritional arguments for the elimination of junk food may not be effective enough to wean people away from a poor diet. Almost everyone, however, understands the bene- fits of saving money. Eliminating junk food not only results in better health, but it means a real savings in the amount of money spent every day.

Let’s look at the typical costs for a junk food habit for the average person. During a week, every person in this country is calculated to consume, on the average; the follow- ing amounts of junk food:

One Week of Junk Food And Us Cost

• 7 bottles of soda
• 1 package of gum
• 2 quarts of ice cream
• 2 ounces of snack chips
• 1 dozen doughnuts
• 1 pound of cookies or sweets
• 6 ounces of candy 1982 costs for such foods: $16 Notice that the above does not take into consideration any fast food eaten out or convenience foods prepared (such as frozen desserts, sugared cereals, etc.) The average spent on such foods per week varies greatly, but a conservative estimate of the costs of such foods per week is around $18. Not only do these junk foods and fast foods cost money to eat, but the after-effects of consuming such foods often results in additional money being spent. Indigestion, headaches, colds, hemorrhoids, colitis, and many other ailments may be traced to junk food consumption. The average person may spend another $5 per week just on “medi- cine cabinet” remedies or over-the-counter drugs for these illnesses that result from such foods. A year of junk food eating also typically results in about six new cavities and a tooth needing capping or pulling, according to figures from Army dentists. This translates into an average $10 per week for dental care. We still do not know the costs of medical expenses that accumulate because junk food eaters go to their doctors, nor can we accurately figure in how many lost days of work result from such a diet. Even so, the total costs of eating junk food for a year are impressive. Consider these ‘figures: Annual Costs of a Junk Food Diet

Junk foods $832

Fast foods $936

Drugs and Medication $260

Dental Bills $520

Medical Bills (estimate) $250

Days lost from work (estimate) $350

Total yearly loss of income from junk foods $3,148

By eliminating junk foods from the diet, a person would realize enough yearly savin- gs to purchase a new car every three years. He or she would have more energy, a higher level of health and well-being, and literally extra years to enjoy such benefits. No one really knows how much junk foods shorten the lifespan, but it would probably not be unrealistic to use the same figures that are often quoted for cigarette smokers. Every cig- arette smoked means a 15-minute decrease in your life. Junk foods, with all their poisons and additives, may be more harmful than smoking and it would not be unreasonable to assume for every bag of cookies or quart of ice cream, you’re knocking off hours, days, and weeks of your life.

Understand that these figures are speculative and have no sound basis in hard re- search simply because no one has had an opportunity to study the long-term effects of eating junk foods. We are the first generation of guinea pigs for the high-sugar, high-salt, high-fat and high-poison junk food diet.

Regardless, it is painfully obvious that people who consume junk foods not only steal money from themselves and their families, but also lay the foundation for expen- sive and painful suffering in the years to come. Can any type of food or sensual pleasure be worth these costs? Is a chocolate chip cookie or a scoop of ice cream or a diet soda worth $3000 plus a year?

The next time someone says to you, “I’m just dying for a piece of that cake or pie,” you should let them know that that is just precisely what they are doing, and they are also paying dearly for this “privilege.”

38.4.4 Kicking The Habit

As we have seen, the junk food problem is not simply one of nutrition. Good nutri- tion is easy to teach, but is only partially effective in getting people away from their junk food habits.

People must also be made aware of the economic and psychological aspects of eating junk food. This lesson should help you educate others who are ready to abandon the typ- ical high junk food diet of most Americans.

First, teach the person the economic facts of life about junk foods.

1. Junkfoodsareveryexpensivetoeatintermsoftheactualnutritionprovided.Mostjunk foods have only about 10% of the food you are paying for. The rest is for pretty packag- ing, promotion, advertising and profits.
2. Junk foods cost you twice. Once when you pay the overinflated prices for them and again when you pay the costs of ill health that they produce.
3. AtypicaloverfedAmericanfamilycansaveanywherefrom$5,000to$10,000ayearif they eliminate all fast foods and convenience foods from their diets. This saving results from the actual costs of the junk food, the sick time lost because of them, and the inci- dental expenses of eating such foods. Second, the person must be made aware of the psychological reasons for junk food addiction. He should be told that most eating patterns are based on emotional and not ra- tional decisions. Foods as a reward or punishment should not be used—neither for chil- dren nor adults.

Negative eating habits and poor choices sometimes result from a lack of self-esteem or self-worth. A person addicted to junk food may have other serious problems connect- ed with the personality or with social behavior. To eliminate junk foods from such a per- son’s diet, he or she must also embark upon an overall health program of improvement. They must view themselves in a different light, and consider themselves worthy of good health and sickness-free living.

Third, children are especially vulnerable to junk foods. Outside of rational explana- tions and setting a good example, you can wean children away from junk foods with healthy substitutes. Sweet dried fruits can replace candies. Fresh juices or blended fruits can take the place of sugary drinks. Realize that most children want the sweetness of junk foods because they have a natural sweet tooth and demand for high-carbohydrate foods that can supply them with energy. In this case, give them plenty of natural carbo- hydrates with fresh fruits, dried fruits and occassional nuts and seeds.

The way to fight junk food addiction is through education. Tell your friends, your family and your clients about the nutritional inadequacies of these foods. Let them see the economic harm that also comes from consuming such foods. An approach to this problem on several levels—nutritional, economic, and psychological—can help most people end their romance with junk food and give them years of healthy and illness-free living.

38.5. Questions & Answers

There’s one aspect of junk foods that you overlooked. The ecological benefits from avoiding all junk foods.

Thank you. That is also a very important area, and it may help some people end their consumption of these foods. Ecologically, junk foods are a disaster. Right now there are millions of acres of trees and rain forests in South America that are being destroyed forever by a major hamburger chain. They are clear-cutting trees hundreds of years old so that they can raise more cattle at a cheap price for their hamburgers. Not only that, but millions of trees are sacrificed annually so that these hamburgers and french fries can be packaged in paper and wrappings.

Junk food is a rich source of both external and internal pollution. Litter from junk food products is astounding, and it is everywhere. My family and I were once picking peaches in a large orchard that allowed the public to pick and eat all the peaches they wanted., We were happily picking and eating tree-ripened fruit right in the orchard. Suddenly I noticed that all over the grounds of the orchard were candy bar wrappers, chip bags, empty soda cans, and bags from rake-out fast food places.

Here were thousands of luscious fruits all around us—the natural food for man, and the best available, just for the picking. What were people doing? They were bringing in bags of junk food and throwing the remains on the ground. They had become so blinded and desensitized by their addiction to junk foods that they could not even recognize wholesome foods that were literally hanging before their very eyes.

Not only that, but after eating such foods, their consciousness was so deadened that they threw the trash and garbage from these foods all around them. It’s sad, but people that eat junk and trash foods often act trashy. There is no way that you can claim to be concerned about the environment or ecology and still eat junk foods. It’s a contradiction, and junk foods are a significant part of the pollution affecting our planet.

My problem is other people. They all think I never have any fun because I won’t eat their “fun” foods, like potato chips and cookies. They tell me that I’m cheating myself out of some simple enjoyments. What should I say in return?

The main problem with junk food is that so many people see it as a harmless pleasure or as a legitimate form of entertainment. Food should be pleasurable to eat, but too often it is used just as social entertainment. Why people think that you must eat health-destroying foods to be sociable is a mystery. Often you will find people that eat junk foods do indeed know better. They realize that they are making poor and incorrect food choices, and no doubt they unconsciously resent it when you do not “join in” and give your support to their bad habits.

Probably the best thing to say when offered junk foods is a polite and smiling, “No, thank you” without any further explanation. If you’re pressed, simply say that you feel much better when you don’t eat such foods. Make it sound like your rejec- tions of these foods is a personal choice and not an attack on their dietary habits.

People dislike being told that they are doing the wrong thing—especially when they already suspect it. By remaining pleasant and exhibiting a well-balanced at- titude toward such foods, you may make a positive impression on the person and thereby encourage them to also give up junk foods. By no means should you lecture to the person or point out how much better you are than them. A well-balanced, healthy person is usually a strong enough argument for the avoidance of junk foods.

My friends always tell me that fast foods are a cheap way to eat dinner, and that they really couldn’t afford to eat just fresh fruit and vegetables. Now you say that these foods are actually costly. What’s the truth?

Fast foods are deceptive. Certainly you can fill your stomach up for every little money, but this “full” feeling is because of the heavy amounts of grease and fat pre- sent in these foods as well as the cheap white bread and filler that they use.

Junk foods may seem like a cheap way to fill up, but they are an expensive way to get nutrition. Proper eating is not just having your stomach full. When these same people who get a cheap meal at a fast food place later have to pay hundreds of dollars on dental or medical care, they don’t see the connection. When they later have cancers, heart problems, kidney failure and premature aging, they never sus- pect that they are results of too many “cheap” meals.

You cannot cheat your body of the nutrients and foods it needs by just “filling it up” with cheap, greasy bulk. The best way to eat inexpensively is to select those foods that promote the highest level of health—regardless of financial costs. You see, even if you spend twice as much for good foods than for junk foods, you’re avoiding the much greater expenses of pain, suffering and ill-health.

Junk foods are nutritionally worthless and health-destroying. Yet they still make up, half of the average person’s diet. Why? Because the economics of junk food production and promotion make them a high-profit and a highly visible item.

People are first manipulated by the manufacturers into buying junk foods, and then they are controlled by their psychological addictions to continue eating the foods.

Eliminating junk foods from a person’s diet depends upon a three-fold ap- proach. First, intensive nutritional education. This is the rational appeal. Next, a concrete illustration of how much money can be saved if junk foods are eliminated (actual costs of the foods, expensive sicknesses caused by such foods, etc.). This is the material appeal. Finally, an explanation of the psychological factors in eating junk foods (how they serve as an emotional substitute, how they are used to “re- ward” or “punish.”) This is the emotional appeal. An education program of this sort is effective in breaking the junk food addiction.

Article #1: Control Through Clear Thinking by A.D. Andrews, Jr.

I have a Master of Science Degree in Health Education. Also I have been certified (for life) by the State of Missouri to teach classes in Health. This presentation of personal achievement is supposed to impress you. It is important that I make a big impression on you at the beginning of this article because I am getting ready to make some highly un- usual statements in the very next paragraph and I want you to pay close attention to the statements and to follow the advice which I offer.

If you are going to eat anything besides raw foods, namely fruits, nuts and palatable vegetables, then eat the junkiest foods you can get. Eat canned foods, processed foods. When you cook at home cook out of aluminum utensils. Peel all vegetables and boil them thoroughly. Fry foods in cast iron skillets at high temperatures using saturated fats and oils. Apply salt, pepper and other condiments freely. Pay no attention to combina- tions. Eat as much as you can stuff down. Have rich desserts and drink liquids with your meals.

Now my earnest advice is for you to eat no cooked foods, only raw foods. However, if and when you “slip” eat all things bad and nothing good. I am completely earnest. Here is why. It will make you quite ill, quite soon and shake you up. It will bring you back to your senses, put you back on the straight and narrow. You may even decide to fast for a day or two to keep your wits about you for an extended period of time. It will precipitate or stimulate symptoms of acute disease. You will have no difficulty relating cause and effect.

It helps clear thinking if we learn to think through analogies. A number of years ago friends of mine were “busy-busy” working for the enactment of a “humane” slaughter law in the state of Missouri. They were disgruntled that I fought against this bill. (It passed, by the way.) Why did I fight against it? People already are too far removed from the act of slaughter and what it entails. The attractively arranged meat platter with gar- nish and color seldom is connected with the violence it took initially to bring that pleas- ing plate to the table. Those appealing prepackaged meats on display in the local super- market are a far cry from the appalling brutality of the slaughter house. So the very thing that is needed is whatever is at hand to make people see flesh eating for what is really is, a barbarous, gruesome, ugly, cruel practice that destroys human morality as surely as it destroys the animals we kill. Flesh eaters need to see their flesh in stark reality as corpse rather than prime rib, as carcass of a dead animal instead of K.C. steak, as cesspools of putrefaction rather than as sources of complete protein. Already people are mired and bogged in the slough of a vile practice. The last thing they need is further lulling with thoughts that it all has been accomplished “Humanely.” And the long-range effects of any practice that benumbs man’s noble instincts of kindness and concern for creatures less able than himself are more dangerous and devastating to his final demise than the damage done by the pathological effect of meat-eating on his body.

People are rather fooled in their minds with the seriousness of an offense (in any area) in relation to the overall harm that is done. They assume, for example, that ar- senic is more “dangerous” than, say, fluorides in public drinking water. They assume this because they see an arsenic victim agonize and die on the spot. The fluoridated water drinker seems to go on day after day and live out his “normal” life.

The truth of the matter is that one man takes arsenic and dies. Many people see the result of this, see it quite clearly. They understand what they saw and no one ever consid- ers taking arsenic purposefully or accidentally. He fears and runs from arsenic, arsenic compounds or anything containing or thought to contain arsenic. One dies; many live.

However, the man who “thinks” it’s a good idea to drink only distilled or filtered or mountain stream water, may, at inconvenient times, get caught thirsty in an office build- ing or a friend’s home or he may just react mechanically as he passes a drinking fountain and take a drink of fluoridated water assuming in his mind that “It won’t kill him.” But when the sum total of all the damage to all life done by drinking and using fluoridated

water is considered, it will be recognized that far more damage has been done than was done by the one dose of arsenic from which many learned their lessons. Here, no one learns. To the contrary all are lulled into the acceptance and further practice of something which gradually will leech the health potential of the entire nation. And down, down, down we shall go until we know again the company of the dodo bird!

This one practice is only one of many things we do that sap us, drain us. And it is our rationalization of each one’s being only a minor thing. We wrongly see narcotics as being more harmful than candy; alcohol as being more dangerous than white bread. The list could be added to indefinitely. We see the big lie as sinful but the white lie as expedi- ent. We view the robber and the thief with disdain but tell our own children to lie about their ages to enter cinema or ride the bus for less cost. Less cost, my eye! The bomb- ing of a Birmingham church that kills little children is horrible, I agree. But, at least it shakes up and horrifies the total nation and causes it to examine its conscience. And the damage done is nothing when compared to the insiduous moral erosion that takes place day after day, year after year, by individuals collectively and sustainingly thinking, feel- ing, voicing little hates, biases, prejudices against other human beings for any reason be it race, religion, business or politics.

Why is man forever fooled and deluded by the obvious? Why does he clutch so tena- ciously to a dollar bill and look so disdainfully upon a penny? It is recognition of this foible that makes beggars rich! And it doesn’t matter what be the area—food, drink, health, crime, morality, everything. It is not the big, obvious things we have to fear. We know the big things for what they are. We have no trouble relating big things to their results, to the damage they do.

It is a little thing done over and over for a long period of time that does widespread, irreparable harm. It is the variety of little things which when considered in aggregate kill individuals and nations.

Let us work to broaden our picture of the present to include yesterday and tomorrow, yesteryear and the years ahead. Let’s become aware, really aware that an act is the same as the result of an act. Cancer is horrible! It is ugly, painful, frightening, stinking. No one argues this. And if this be so then all things that lead or contribute to cancer are ugly, painful, frightening, stinking! It cannot be otherwise.

So, if you see a single, occasional, sociable cup of coffee, with an old friend as being “nice,” then brother, you are blind! And a blind fool at that...because coffee and stom- ach cancer are related. They are one and the same. And if you say, “So what, I’ll run the risk for the pleasure of the moment,” then, brother, not only are you a fool, you also are insane!

If a man is sitting in the middle of the floor hitting himself in the head with a hammer you have no trouble adjudging him as nuts. And because he says he enjoys each blow knowing it will finally destroy him makes him no less crazy. There is no difference be- tween him and ourselves except that we have more company.

We will be wise to examine all our practice’s in unemotional, unfettered light without reference to immediacy of pleasure, custom, tradition, conformity, external appearances, likes or dislikes. Examine these practices and determine one by one whether they are good or bad, healthful or harmful, right or wrong. Not just a little bit of one and a little bit of the other. Remember that nothing can be innocuous. Make it clear cut, black or white, no grays. And most important of all! Remember that the less harmful it seems to be the more dangerous it actually is to the greatest number of people over the greatest period of time.

And when you pick out the harmfulness of a practice, no matter how small and in- significant it may seem to be, then relate it to the big damage to which it contributes later on. When you do this you will see the little practice for what it really is. Also, and just as pregnant, you will see the big damage for what it really is. A morally sick society is made up of morally sick, singular persons. A war is but the remote extension of conflict and greed at the level of individuals. Hardened arteries are but the accumulation of many

single deviant acts each of which seemed delightful at its moment but none of which can be recalled a day after it has occurred.

It can be no other way. Can it? Do you see the big point I am making? War never caused greed, greed causes war. Hardened arteries never caused a man to eat greasy foods; greasy foods easily can be related to hardening of the arteries. Think about it. Come to understand that any practice, any action or reaction, anything that you do that you can recognize to be against your inner sense of well being, your fitness, your longevity is bad, wicked, sinful, evil and must be seen in that light. To see it in any oth- er light is illusion, delusion, unreal. You don’t have to be a college graduate to under- stand these things. (In fact, it may hinder your clarity.) All you have to do is to be quiet within yourself and think. Don’t “work” at “think,” just be still within yourself and the message will come through. Try it. You’ll see. Life will be less hectic. “Control” will come easier, because when one really understands, he understands with his whole, en- tire self—not just with his mind. And when there is understanding, change in behavior comes. You don’t have to “struggle” or “fight.” Just learn to broaden your concept of today to include yesterday and tomorrow, yesteryear and all the years ahead. If you do, there will be more of them. They will be better ones too.

Reprinted from The Health Crusader, September 1979

Article #2: Is This The Kind Of System You’d Like To Live Under?

In this country we have what is called the capitalist system. Its sole motive is to produce for profits. The other day we received a brochure from LITTLE FREE PRESS that points out some of the inhumane drives of our present system. LITTLE FREE PRESS advocates a system that involves a non-money non-credit economy...a very challenging concept. I have embellished their points somewhat but they areas follows:

1. The establishment (capitalism as a system) is rapacious and indifferent to human wel- fare. It places private profit above peddling of pernicious products by the tobacco indus- try, the drug industry, the junk food industry and the recent mass manipulation of fuel supplies to jack up the prices of petroleum products—price hikes that bore no relation- ship to costs...charges all the marketplace will bear.
2. Pollutingair,landandwaterismoreprofitablethanrecyclingwastesinmostcasesorin installing equipment to prevent its release into the ecosphere.
3. Innuclearenergyhumansafetyandwelfarehavebeensubjugatedtothequestforprof- its. Nuclear wastes are a legacy that can boomerang very quickly on us and keep poster- ity on the hook if not, indeed, outright suffering, for perhaps thousands of years.
4. War and war industries are more profitable than peace.
5. Planned obsolescence is more profitable than quality. Goods that will wear out faster are thus put on the market. Things are made for use, yes, but industry needs repeat cus- tomers to keep sales and profits high. If an automobile lasted in great condition for 50 years (as Rolls Royces do), the automobile industry wouldn’t come out nearly as well as they presently do. Deliberate waste of human and material resources is built into a system geared to the profit system.
6. Discontented and unhappy people can be exploited for more profit and happy people.
7. Sicknessanddiseasearethebasesforprofitableindustries.Healthypeoplearenotcus- tomers for disease treating business. Inasmuch as the petroleum industry, the drug in- dustry, the hospital industry and the medical trades need diseased people for their profit- geared operations, they will fight tooth and nail steps that threaten this cushy racket of trading upon suffering and misery.
8. Cultivatinganatmosphereoffear,mistrust,ignorance,confusionandnurturingoutright lies and myths are a basis of great profit whereas an informed people shun the whole thing.

1. Overconsumption,overbuying,needlessbuying,ostentation(keepingupwithandahead of the Jones) are encouraged that the beneficiaries of the system might realize more sales and profits.
2. Peoplewhothinkforthemselvesandwhogetoffthecommercialtreadmillareathreat to the system whereas those who unthinkingly accept the system and who bask in the superficial “roman circuses” designed to mislead and allay human intellect are the raw material from which much profit can be derived. In short the thrust of all commercial en- deavors is to create a populace that accepts the status quo of the profit system, glossing over its injustices, its inhumaneness and its predisposition to churn out human wreckage rather than dignified humans.
3. Disposableproductsaremoreprofitablethandurableones.Eventhoughitiswastefulof our resources forest by forest, we cite as an example the use of paper towels versus fab- ric towels. Fabric towels can last years. One towel represents perhaps a $2 value. Over the same period one individual might use fifty or sixty rolls of paper towels that cost $40. The use of the one conserves resources, the use of the other expends them prodigal- ly. America is geared to a “built-in wasteful system.”
4. Makingthingsundulycomplex,mysteriousandinscrutableismoreprofitablethanmak- ing things simple.
5. Monopolies and controlled markets are more profitable than free trade.
6. When people have accidents, suffer from illness, catastrophe, etc. there is profit to be realized. A content and happy people are a poor market. Thus you can see how inverted and perverted our values are. I’ll end quoting Ernest Mann, author of the piece: “If we don’t switch our method of “economic motivation” soon, our striving for prof- it may ruin our life-support system beyond the point of no return.” What is your role in this great play? Are you a tiny gear that helps to keep this jug- gernaut rolling? Could you find a way to survive without working for a company that is destroying our environment? Are you adding to people’s distractions, to keep them from becoming aware of viable alternatives? Or are you helping others to become aware of our problems and turning them onto the solutions? Reprinted from The Health Crusader, October 1979 Article #3: Blueprint For Survival by Keki R. Sidhwa, N.D., D.O. The great international debate today is not about the imminence of internecine war or the morality of nuclear weapons. It is about the quality of life that we may expect in the future for ourselves and our children. The important question now is—can the human race survive in terms of our present day relationship with the world outside and nature and, if we do manage to survive, in what state of health or ill health? Are we heading for doom, come what may, or do we still have a chance? In which direction is the world heading? There is no easy answer to the question. The web of life that nature has woven on this finite plant is immensely complex, full of subtle balances and involved interplays. Natural Hygiene has always, from the beginning, demanded that we understand this scheme of natural balance. Now it seems the time is approaching when we either pay heed or pay the consequences. Instead of exploiting the natural resources we must learn to conserve and thus try to achieve once more the balance that nature achieved on earth before the impact of man and his “technological achievements.” Not only must we understand how man has disturbed the balance, but learn what steps we must take to rectify that mistake. Have we the will to make the changes we must make? Have we the power? I do not know. But, if only because of our growing understanding of our plight, I still hope.

The more of us who try to live a Hygienic Life—the better it is for the world also. Natural Hygiene is not smug isolation from the rest of the world. It is total commitment on behalf of the whole of mankind and the animal kingdom. The fact that you benefit also is incidental—a sort of bonus for the total involvement with the rest of life. By ob- serving the following blueprint for the individual you will help the human race to sur- vive:

1. Try to control the size of your family unit by natural means.
2. Use durables rather than disposables. Boycott over-packaged products, especially in plastics and aluminum and anything in nonreturnable or aerosol containers. Take your empties back to your store and tell them to re-use them.
3. Keep pesticides out of your home.
4. Boycott convenience foods and eat natural whole foods rather than fragmented foods. Use the wild foods that grow near you. Grow and preserve as much as possible. Eat veg- etable rather than animal protein. Buy insect or virus blemished foods, they are less like- ly to be polluted by pesticides. Eat to live, not live to eat. Enjoy your food by all means and get all the pleasure out of it that you can, but don’t be greedy. Overeating is not only a crime against your body, it is a crime against all living creatures. Getting the most out of your food is an art that only Hygienists have perfected.
5. Use building materials from reclaimed industrial waste.
6. Insulateyourhousewellandcutyourenergyconsumption.Bygettingplentyofexercise and keeping fit you maintain body warmth through efficient circulation. In winter put on extra clothing, keep moving and save heating fuel.
7. Water shortage—then shower instead of bathing. Never flush poisons in the W.C. Boy- cott detergents.
8. Uselowwattageforlightbulbs.Makethemostofnaturallight.Letlight,sunshineand air into your house. In order to conserve power do things with your hands. Use machines only when absolutely necessary.
9. For transport use a car with fuel economy in mind. Use a bicycle to go about in your town or village. Avoid lead-additive gasolines.
10. Inyourdailylifeusebothsidesofpaperinwriting.Passonoutgrowntoysandclothes. Compost all organic waste. Garden without pesticides, herbicides, chemical fertilizers, etc.
11. Inyourcommunityorganizealocalrecyclingclubforglass,paper,cloth,ironandsteel.
12. Monitoralllocalgovernmentplansfortheirenvironmentaleffects.Pressformaximum recycling, especially of water in local industries. Press your local authority to make com- post out of sewage. In the final analysis we have to realize profoundly as Natural Hygienists that all our studies, deep and superficial, whether through books or by direct and personal experi- ence in any form, cannot be divorced from living. We can have more life, only if we help to enhance the whole of life. Reprinted from Dr. Shelton’s Hygienic Review, January 1977 Article #4: Junk Fooders Have It Made The University of Montana conducted some experiments on the food preferences of five- year old children before and after exposure to TV food commercials. “Natural prefer- ence” and preference after exposure to TV food commercials were compared. The children were free to choose from junk foods such as corn chips, sweet cereals, cookies, soda pop, etc. and from higher-nutrition foods such as cheese, carrots, grapes, apples, milk and orange juice. Their natural preference was measured based on this si- multaneous exposure.

Then the children were shown a mere 12 minutes of children’s programming that included a half-dozen commercials for both low nutrition foods and for the higher-nutri- tion foods. Then back to the food tables and guess what?

The children consumed more junk foods and less higher-nutrition foods than in the previous exposure. Moreover, the children were more excited about the junk and had more recall of the junk food ads than of the other food ads.

It would seem the junkier your food products are, the better chance you have of sell- ing them through TV advertising.

Reprinted from The Health Crusader, December 1979